• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

Third Point Abandons CoStar Campaign, Dumps Entire Stake

April 11, 2026

Daniel Loeb’s hedge fund Third Point has walked away from its activist campaign against CoStar Group, selling its entire position in the real estate data company after concluding that its original investment thesis no longer held, according to a letter to investors.

Third Point had signaled in January that it would pursue a board challenge at CoStar — its first activist campaign in three years — seeking to force the company to change directors and restructure operations. At the time, the fund demanded CoStar exit its residential business entirely, suggesting the company fold Homes.com and refocus on its core commercial real estate operations, moves that came after what Third Point characterized as a year of unmet promises.

The retreat marks a significant reversal. Third Point acknowledged that its strategy to realign CoStar’s focus on core operations would not be effective, particularly as the company’s shares have dropped more than 50% over the past year.

“We no longer believe that our original thesis holds true today and have disposed of our position in its entirety,” Mr. Loeb wrote in the investor letter. The fund never disclosed the size of its stake in CoStar, the owner of Apartments.com and Homes.com.

The hedge fund changed course after it became clear to Mr. Loeb and his team that their plans to pressure the company into focusing more squarely on its core business might not salvage the company after all.

Third Point and multi-strategy hedge fund D.E. Shaw had previously struck a deal to avert a proxy fight, but that agreement expired in January, prompting Mr. Loeb to announce plans to replace a majority of CoStar’s board and take aim at the chief executive’s compensation packages.

Third Point had previously obtained board representation at companies including Baxter and Disney through amicable negotiations, though the firm had signaled it would not hesitate to launch a proxy fight if its concerns were ignored. The decision to exit entirely rather than press forward suggests the fund saw little prospect of recovering value through continued engagement.

By: DNU staff

Filed Under: Business, Featured

Related Articles:

  • Berkshire’s Abel Era Takes Shape
  • Study: Scams Cost Americans $68 Billion
  • Amazon Pays $2.25 Million to Settle Federal Identity Theft Records Case
  • Gold’s Surge Sets High Bar for Barrick Earnings Monday
  • CoreWeave Set to Report Second-Quarter Results Tuesday
  • Montana Ranks Second in Nation for Hourly Wage Growth

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Trump Imposes Tariffs Up to 100% on Imported Drones, Citing National Security
  • Tax Shelter Promoter Pleads Guilty in Scheme That Cost IRS $43 Million
  • UM-Providence Partnership Targets Improving Healthcare for Rural Kids
  • Lawsuit trial starts against Facebook, Instagram over youths

Recent Politics Posts

  • Teacher unions dedicate money to political activism, lobbying
  • Trade Union Breaks From Democrats, Back Flint
  • Congress sluggish on federal AI framework as concerns intensify
  • Knudsen Restores Pre-Bullock Term Limits Rule

Recent Business Posts

  • Montana Ranks Second in Nation for Hourly Wage Growth
  • Treasury Permanently Ends Beneficial Ownership Reporting for U.S. Businesses
  • Amazon Pays $2.25 Million to Settle Federal Identity Theft Records Case
  • Berkshire’s Abel Era Takes Shape

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.