• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

Jury: Greenpeace liable for hundreds of millions in damages over pipeline project protests

March 22, 2025

(The Center Square) – A North Dakota jury on Wednesday found environmental activist group Greenpeace liable for hundreds of millions of dollars in damages for its activities related to protests of construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Dallas-based Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace over the sometimes violent protests that delayed construction of the pipeline by five months, costing the company lost profits and shareholder value.

A trial over the civil lawsuit began in February and concluded Wednesday, on the second day of deliberations.

Energy Transfer subsidiary Dakota Access LLC installed the roughly 1,200-mile pipeline running from North Dakota to Illinois in 2016 and 2017. In April 2016, a small group of Sioux set up Sacred Stone Camp, a camp to protest the installation of the pipeline under the river on unceded treaty land for fear that the pipeline could leak and contaminate the river and water supply. They also said the pipeline would disrupt sacred burial grounds and other culturally relevant sites.

With funding and other support from environmental activist group Greenpeace and others, the protest grew and eventually attracted international media attention, especially when clashes with law enforcement became violent. Over 100,000 people descended on rural North Dakota in less than a year, many from other states and possibly some from abroad, according to local residents.

Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace, blaming it for the escalation of the protests that delayed completion of the project by five months. The company says the delay cost them lost profits and shareholder value. It sued Greenpeace for $300 million.

Greenpeace maintained its primary involvement in the protests was sending indigenous nonviolent direct action trainers, camping supplies and a biodiesel-powered solar truck to the site and that the lawsuit against it was an attack on First Amendment rights.

 

By Morgan Sweeney | The Center Square

Filed Under: Featured, Home Featured, News

Related Articles:

  • White House Report Estimates $49 Trillion Cost of Democratic Socialist Policies
  • Flint, Forstag Trade Attacks in First Western District Debate
  • Knudsen Presses Federal Action on TP-Link
  • Scott Twito Named Interim U.S. Attorney for Montana
  • TSMC Earnings Put AI Chip Demand in Focus This Week
  • Minnesota Woman Convicted in $3.6 Million Medicaid Housing Fraud Scheme

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Troy Aikman Hints at ESPN Exit
  • National Security Expert to Speak at University of North Dakota Nov. 5
  • What is the best battery backup for every home and budget?
  • Scott Twito Named Interim U.S. Attorney for Montana

Recent Politics Posts

  • Billings City Council Votes to Sell Lampman Park for $834,000 Housing Development
  • White House Report Estimates $49 Trillion Cost of Democratic Socialist Policies
  • Wyoming Congressional Candidates Debate Federal Spending, Immigration and Government Reform
  • Sheehy Praises Trump Announcement of New Military Training Range in Montana

Recent Business Posts

  • Cboe Names Catherine Grover Chief Human Resources Officer
  • How to get your whole team fluent in generative AI
  • Union Pacific Fights Release of CEO’s Rate-Hike Threat
  • Bank of America Hit With Record Penalties Over Money Laundering Violations

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.