• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

Jury: Greenpeace liable for hundreds of millions in damages over pipeline project protests

March 22, 2025

(The Center Square) – A North Dakota jury on Wednesday found environmental activist group Greenpeace liable for hundreds of millions of dollars in damages for its activities related to protests of construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Dallas-based Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace over the sometimes violent protests that delayed construction of the pipeline by five months, costing the company lost profits and shareholder value.

A trial over the civil lawsuit began in February and concluded Wednesday, on the second day of deliberations.

Energy Transfer subsidiary Dakota Access LLC installed the roughly 1,200-mile pipeline running from North Dakota to Illinois in 2016 and 2017. In April 2016, a small group of Sioux set up Sacred Stone Camp, a camp to protest the installation of the pipeline under the river on unceded treaty land for fear that the pipeline could leak and contaminate the river and water supply. They also said the pipeline would disrupt sacred burial grounds and other culturally relevant sites.

With funding and other support from environmental activist group Greenpeace and others, the protest grew and eventually attracted international media attention, especially when clashes with law enforcement became violent. Over 100,000 people descended on rural North Dakota in less than a year, many from other states and possibly some from abroad, according to local residents.

Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace, blaming it for the escalation of the protests that delayed completion of the project by five months. The company says the delay cost them lost profits and shareholder value. It sued Greenpeace for $300 million.

Greenpeace maintained its primary involvement in the protests was sending indigenous nonviolent direct action trainers, camping supplies and a biodiesel-powered solar truck to the site and that the lawsuit against it was an attack on First Amendment rights.

 

By Morgan Sweeney | The Center Square

Filed Under: Featured, Home Featured, News

Related Articles:

  • CoreWeave Set to Report Second-Quarter Results Tuesday
  • Health insurance premiums rival mortgage costs as 2027 could see huge rate hikes
  • Newsoms show financial picture in four years of tax returns
  • Knudsen Extends MVD Fee Waivers for Citizenship Marker Through September
  • Daines Taxpayer Privacy Provision Clears Senate Finance Committee
  • Ken Paxton’s campaign says he will debate James Talarico in Texas’ U.S. Senate race

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Trump Administration Reviews Wilderness Policies Across Idaho, the West
  • Two Former NBA Players Say They Plan to Enter WNBA Draft
  • Biden’s Cancer Has Spread Further, Son Says
  • Medal of Honor Monday: Army Cpl. Jake Allex

Recent Politics Posts

  • Wyoming Game and Fish Director Resigns, Moves to Governor’s Office
  • Montana Senate Race Turns Combative as Withdrawal Deadline Nears
  • Daines Taxpayer Privacy Provision Clears Senate Finance Committee
  • Sheehy Introduces Two Bipartisan Bills

Recent Business Posts

  • CoreWeave Set to Report Second-Quarter Results Tuesday
  • Friedberg Says Starlink Could Become a $1 Trillion Business
  • Gold’s Surge Sets High Bar for Barrick Earnings Monday
  • Dow, S&P 500 Hit All-Time Highs on Strong Earnings

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.