• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

Jury: Greenpeace liable for hundreds of millions in damages over pipeline project protests

March 22, 2025

(The Center Square) – A North Dakota jury on Wednesday found environmental activist group Greenpeace liable for hundreds of millions of dollars in damages for its activities related to protests of construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Dallas-based Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace over the sometimes violent protests that delayed construction of the pipeline by five months, costing the company lost profits and shareholder value.

A trial over the civil lawsuit began in February and concluded Wednesday, on the second day of deliberations.

Energy Transfer subsidiary Dakota Access LLC installed the roughly 1,200-mile pipeline running from North Dakota to Illinois in 2016 and 2017. In April 2016, a small group of Sioux set up Sacred Stone Camp, a camp to protest the installation of the pipeline under the river on unceded treaty land for fear that the pipeline could leak and contaminate the river and water supply. They also said the pipeline would disrupt sacred burial grounds and other culturally relevant sites.

With funding and other support from environmental activist group Greenpeace and others, the protest grew and eventually attracted international media attention, especially when clashes with law enforcement became violent. Over 100,000 people descended on rural North Dakota in less than a year, many from other states and possibly some from abroad, according to local residents.

Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace, blaming it for the escalation of the protests that delayed completion of the project by five months. The company says the delay cost them lost profits and shareholder value. It sued Greenpeace for $300 million.

Greenpeace maintained its primary involvement in the protests was sending indigenous nonviolent direct action trainers, camping supplies and a biodiesel-powered solar truck to the site and that the lawsuit against it was an attack on First Amendment rights.

 

By Morgan Sweeney | The Center Square

Filed Under: Featured, Home Featured, News

Related Articles:

  • Warsh Sworn In as Federal Reserve Chair
  • Daines Pushes Bureau of Indian Affairs to Complete Fort Belknap Water Rights Settlement
  • Ninth Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Climate Case
  • Treasury Targets Hizballah-Aligned Officials Obstructing Peace and Disarmament
  • Gianforte Highlights Rural Business, Energy, and Agriculture on 56 County Tour
  • Rallies, ad blitzes and a Trump endorsement: inside the final days of the Cornyn-Paxton runoff

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Montana Leads Multi-State Challenge to California Physician DEI Requirement
  • Ninth Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Climate Case
  • Senate Confirms Katie Lane as Montana’s Newest Federal District Judge
  • Montana Department of Labor Launches Online Wage Claim Portal

Recent Politics Posts

  • Eight Senate Republicans broke ranks this week. John Cornyn, spurned by Trump in his primary, didn’t.
  • Speaker Johnson Calls Out Democrats on Fraud While Touting Tax Cut Results
  • Montana Senate Race Takes Shape With Alme, Bankhead, and Bodnar Headed to November
  • Flint, Forstag advance in CD1

Recent Business Posts

  • Warsh Takes the Wheel at the Fed
  • MGM, Caesars Takeover Bids Signal New Era for Las Vegas
  • Texas sues Discord, arguing online messaging platform endangered children, misled users
  • Death at SpaceX’s Starbase prompts workplace safety investigation

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.