• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

Jury: Greenpeace liable for hundreds of millions in damages over pipeline project protests

March 22, 2025

(The Center Square) – A North Dakota jury on Wednesday found environmental activist group Greenpeace liable for hundreds of millions of dollars in damages for its activities related to protests of construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Dallas-based Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace over the sometimes violent protests that delayed construction of the pipeline by five months, costing the company lost profits and shareholder value.

A trial over the civil lawsuit began in February and concluded Wednesday, on the second day of deliberations.

Energy Transfer subsidiary Dakota Access LLC installed the roughly 1,200-mile pipeline running from North Dakota to Illinois in 2016 and 2017. In April 2016, a small group of Sioux set up Sacred Stone Camp, a camp to protest the installation of the pipeline under the river on unceded treaty land for fear that the pipeline could leak and contaminate the river and water supply. They also said the pipeline would disrupt sacred burial grounds and other culturally relevant sites.

With funding and other support from environmental activist group Greenpeace and others, the protest grew and eventually attracted international media attention, especially when clashes with law enforcement became violent. Over 100,000 people descended on rural North Dakota in less than a year, many from other states and possibly some from abroad, according to local residents.

Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace, blaming it for the escalation of the protests that delayed completion of the project by five months. The company says the delay cost them lost profits and shareholder value. It sued Greenpeace for $300 million.

Greenpeace maintained its primary involvement in the protests was sending indigenous nonviolent direct action trainers, camping supplies and a biodiesel-powered solar truck to the site and that the lawsuit against it was an attack on First Amendment rights.

 

By Morgan Sweeney | The Center Square

Filed Under: Featured, Home Featured, News

Related Articles:

  • Hegseth authorizes military bases to allow personal firearms for off-duty service members
  • Microsoft Takes Over Texas AI Data Center Expansion After OpenAI Pulls Back
  • Sheehy Introduces Bipartisan Bill to Expand Access to Innovative Veteran Care
  • Knudsen Praises Helena Commission for Rescinding Immigration Resolution
  • Tiger Woods Arrested After Florida Rollover Crash
  • Shareholders approve NorthWestern Energy, Black Hills merger

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Knudsen accuses Gallatin County attorney of sanctuary city violations over ICE data policy
  • DEQ seeks public comment on draft environmental assessment for septic and wastewater systems
  • Heartland Classic in Huron brings in 800-plus FFA students
  • Judge hands former Colstrip teacher 30-year sentence for sexual abuse of student

Recent Politics Posts

  • White House touts March jobs report
  • Labrador Opposes Gender Transition Surgeries for Prisoners
  • Congressional Perks: Senate spending skyrockets by more than 40% in last few years
  • President Signs Bills Authorizing Medal of Honor Awards for Three Service Members

Recent Business Posts

  • Hi-Country Snack Foods pauses production
  • Financial services jobs boom in Montana
  • Shareholders approve NorthWestern Energy, Black Hills merger
  • Bank of America to Pay $72.5 Million to Settle Epstein Victims Lawsuit

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.