• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

DOJ Sues Federal Employee Union, Citing National Security Concerns

March 29, 2025

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against affiliates of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), seeking to end collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) that it claims hinder national security operations.

The lawsuit, filed in the Western District of Texas on behalf of eight federal agencies, follows an executive order issued by President Trump titled Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs. The order asserts that certain agencies engaged in investigative and national security work should not be required to engage in collective bargaining, citing potential risks to government operations.

According to the DOJ, existing CBAs prevent federal agencies from fully implementing workforce policies necessary for their national security missions. The lawsuit aims to confirm the agencies’ legal right to terminate these agreements, avoiding what the DOJ describes as “unnecessary labor strife” while ensuring clarity on the issue.

“We are taking this fight directly to the public-sector unions,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “By affirmatively suing in Texas, we are aggressively protecting President Trump’s efforts to ensure unions no longer interfere in the national security functions of the government.”

The lawsuit argues that collective bargaining agreements have created bureaucratic obstacles that hinder federal agencies’ ability to manage employees performing critical national security, intelligence, and investigative work. It further states that the President “cannot effectively execute the laws or promote national security if his supervision of agents engaged in national security, intelligence, counterintelligence, or investigative missions is stymied by intrusive bargaining agreements and continuous bargaining obligations.”

The case marks a significant escalation in the administration’s efforts to limit the influence of federal employee unions, setting the stage for a legal battle over the intersection of labor rights and national security concerns.

By: DNU staff

Filed Under: Featured, Home Featured, News

Related Articles:

  • GOP senators introduce bill to increase penalties for assaulting ICE officers
  • Governor Gianforte Presents Spirit of Montana Award in Superior
  • Poll Shows Zinke Leading Potential Democratic Challengers
  • DOJ Office of Consumer Protection Prevented Montanans From Losing $1.67 Million in 2025
  • Abbott directs investigation into potential Medicaid fraud in Texas
  • Commerce Awards $600,000 in Grants to 11 Montana Main Street Communities

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Treasury Department Cancels Booz Allen Hamilton Contracts Over Data Security Concerns
  • Commerce Awards $600,000 in Grants to 11 Montana Main Street Communities
  • Businesses close in Minnesota for anti-ICE ‘economic blackout’
  • North Dakota Development Fund Approves Over $452,000 in Q4 Loans

Recent Politics Posts

  • AG Jackley’s Bill Enhancing Penalties for Controlled Substances in Prisons Passes Senate
  • Rhoden Requests Supreme Court Advisory Opinion on Lt. Governor’s Tie-Breaking Vote
  • AGs call on ‘climate cartel’ to uphold consumer protections
  • Defending Ed targets Seattle schools with federal privacy complaint over gender policies

Recent Business Posts

  • New Construction Sector Analysis Highlights Record Growth
  • Montana CSI Holds Public Hearing on BCBSMT Cybersecurity Breach
  • Wall Street Ends Week Lower After a Tumultuous Trading Session
  • Mitsubishi buys Louisiana, Texas shale gas assets for $7.5B

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.