• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

DOJ Sues Federal Employee Union, Citing National Security Concerns

March 29, 2025

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against affiliates of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), seeking to end collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) that it claims hinder national security operations.

The lawsuit, filed in the Western District of Texas on behalf of eight federal agencies, follows an executive order issued by President Trump titled Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs. The order asserts that certain agencies engaged in investigative and national security work should not be required to engage in collective bargaining, citing potential risks to government operations.

According to the DOJ, existing CBAs prevent federal agencies from fully implementing workforce policies necessary for their national security missions. The lawsuit aims to confirm the agencies’ legal right to terminate these agreements, avoiding what the DOJ describes as “unnecessary labor strife” while ensuring clarity on the issue.

“We are taking this fight directly to the public-sector unions,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “By affirmatively suing in Texas, we are aggressively protecting President Trump’s efforts to ensure unions no longer interfere in the national security functions of the government.”

The lawsuit argues that collective bargaining agreements have created bureaucratic obstacles that hinder federal agencies’ ability to manage employees performing critical national security, intelligence, and investigative work. It further states that the President “cannot effectively execute the laws or promote national security if his supervision of agents engaged in national security, intelligence, counterintelligence, or investigative missions is stymied by intrusive bargaining agreements and continuous bargaining obligations.”

The case marks a significant escalation in the administration’s efforts to limit the influence of federal employee unions, setting the stage for a legal battle over the intersection of labor rights and national security concerns.

By: DNU staff

Filed Under: Featured, Home Featured, News

Related Articles:

  • Watchdogs: New Montana law restricting foreign money in elections insufficient
  • Sheehy Fulfills Campaign Promise With Blind Trust
  • Daktronics to Participate in Craig-Hallum’s 22nd Annual Institutional Investor Conference
  • Microsoft Marks 50th Anniversary
  • Lawmakers propose legislation to prevent China’s global military expansion
  • Senator Steve Daines Leads Push to Strengthen Veteran Health Care Access

Primary Sidebar

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Law enforcement agencies in 40 states are partnering with ICE 287(g) program
  • Gallatin College MSU’s online courses expand to meet nontraditional student needs
  • UM Video Game Team Scores National Championship
  • In just a few months, ICE makes 1,000+ worksite enforcement actions

Recent Politics Posts

  • Sheehy Fulfills Campaign Promise With Blind Trust
  • Watchdogs: New Montana law restricting foreign money in elections insufficient
  • Knudsen Urges Gallatin County to Support ICE Partnership
  • Zinke Introduces Bipartisan Bill to Modernize Foreign Military Sales Notification Process

Recent Business Posts

  • Poll: College not preparing students for workforce, managers avoid hiring them
  • Bridger Aerospace Lands Record-Breaking Wildfire Contracts for Super Scooper Aircraft
  • Daktronics to Participate in Craig-Hallum’s 22nd Annual Institutional Investor Conference
  • Microsoft Marks 50th Anniversary

Copyright © 2025 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.