• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

Court blocks Biden rule requiring E.R. doctors to perform abortions

January 5, 2024

(The Center Square) – The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against a Biden administration effort to require emergency room doctors to perform abortions, the latest step in an ongoing legal battle that could end up at the U.S. Supreme Court.

In the case in question, State of Texas v. Becerra, the state of Texas joined forces with the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists as well as the Christian Medical and Dental Associations.

The challengers took on the Biden administrations effort to broaden the interpretation of Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, a rule created to keep certain hospitals with emergency departments from turning patients away.

The Biden administration sought to use that law to require doctors to perform abortions in emergency situations, saying the federal guidance superseded state law.

But the Appellate Court unanimously ruled against the Biden administration.

“The question before the court is whether EMTALA, according to HHS’s Guidance, mandates physicians to provide abortions when that is the necessary stabilizing treatment for an emergency medical condition,” the ruling said. “It does not. We therefore decline to expand the scope of EMTALA.”

Alliance Defending Freedom, a religious freedom legal group involved in the case, celebrated the ruling.

“Hospitals – especially emergency rooms – are tasked with preserving life. The 5th Circuit correctly ruled that the federal government has no business transforming them into abortion clinics,” ADF Senior Vice President of Strategic Initiatives Ryan Bangert said in a statement.

Bangert argued before the court in the case in question.

“Doctors shouldn’t be forced to break the Hippocratic Oath, and they shouldn’t have to choose between violating their deeply held beliefs or facing stiff financial penalties and being barred from the Medicare program,” he said. “Emergency room physicians can, and do, treat life-threatening conditions such as ectopic pregnancies.

“But elective abortion is not life-saving care – it ends the life of the unborn child – and the government has no authority to force doctors to perform these dangerous procedures,” he added.

By Casey Harper | The Center Square

Filed Under: Featured, Politics

Related Articles:

  • Nine pharmaceutical companies agree to most-favored-nation pricing
  • Knudsen Leads 26-State Coalition Seeking DOJ Probe of China-Linked Climate Groups
  • Sen. Jason Ellsworth Charged with official misconduct
  • Supreme Court could redefine 14th Amendment application
  • North Dakota Property Tax Relief Expands to 50,000 Households
  • Lummis Announces She Will Not Seek Reelection to U.S. Senate

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Free speech under fire nearly 300 times in 2025 on campus
  • North Dakota Property Tax Relief Expands to 50,000 Households
  • WYDOT launches online public meeting for Statewide Rail Plan update
  • Gov. Rhoden announces $200,000 grant to expand Keep Farmers Farming program

Recent Politics Posts

  • 2025 in review: Historic border security actions taken by Trump
  • Attorney General Jackley asks court to halt deceptive abortion pill advertising
  • Trump Signs Six Bipartisan Bills Into Law Before Year’s End
  • Congressional Conflicts: Curb on lawmakers’ stock trades draws fire for being weak

Recent Business Posts

  • Everyday Economics: A quiet data week, but loud signals for the economy
  • Stocks Rise in Holiday-Shortened Week as Major Indexes Hit Records
  • Nine pharmaceutical companies agree to most-favored-nation pricing
  • Gianforte Approves 406 JOBS Year One Plan

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.