• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

Court blocks Biden rule requiring E.R. doctors to perform abortions

January 5, 2024

(The Center Square) – The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against a Biden administration effort to require emergency room doctors to perform abortions, the latest step in an ongoing legal battle that could end up at the U.S. Supreme Court.

In the case in question, State of Texas v. Becerra, the state of Texas joined forces with the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists as well as the Christian Medical and Dental Associations.

The challengers took on the Biden administrations effort to broaden the interpretation of Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, a rule created to keep certain hospitals with emergency departments from turning patients away.

The Biden administration sought to use that law to require doctors to perform abortions in emergency situations, saying the federal guidance superseded state law.

But the Appellate Court unanimously ruled against the Biden administration.

“The question before the court is whether EMTALA, according to HHS’s Guidance, mandates physicians to provide abortions when that is the necessary stabilizing treatment for an emergency medical condition,” the ruling said. “It does not. We therefore decline to expand the scope of EMTALA.”

Alliance Defending Freedom, a religious freedom legal group involved in the case, celebrated the ruling.

“Hospitals – especially emergency rooms – are tasked with preserving life. The 5th Circuit correctly ruled that the federal government has no business transforming them into abortion clinics,” ADF Senior Vice President of Strategic Initiatives Ryan Bangert said in a statement.

Bangert argued before the court in the case in question.

“Doctors shouldn’t be forced to break the Hippocratic Oath, and they shouldn’t have to choose between violating their deeply held beliefs or facing stiff financial penalties and being barred from the Medicare program,” he said. “Emergency room physicians can, and do, treat life-threatening conditions such as ectopic pregnancies.

“But elective abortion is not life-saving care – it ends the life of the unborn child – and the government has no authority to force doctors to perform these dangerous procedures,” he added.

By Casey Harper | The Center Square

Filed Under: Featured, Politics

Related Articles:

  • Retired Malmstrom Commander Named to Lead Janicki’s Great Falls Operations
  • Hageman, Byrd Face Off in Wyoming Senate
  • Montana Labor Commissioner Sarah Swanson Elected to National Workforce Leadership Role
  • Mexican National Sentenced to Five Years for Smuggling Migrants Across Canadian Border
  • Union Pacific Fights Release of CEO’s Rate-Hike Threat
  • Knudsen Asks Supreme Court to Review Challenge to DEI Training

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Montana State names Cyndi Johnson as 2026 Outstanding Ag Leader
  • Federal Reserve Report Shows Rising Family Wealth
  • IRS Proposes Stricter Eligibility Rules for Health Insurance Tax Credits
  • A New Y2K Moment: What the Threat of Frontier AI Tells Us about Enterprise Modernization

Recent Politics Posts

  • Hageman, Byrd Face Off in Wyoming Senate
  • New Ad Featuring Smokejumper Targets Forstag
  • Liberal Groups Criticize Idaho Voting Laws Over Registration Requirements
  • Poll: Inflation tops voter concerns, national debt near the bottom

Recent Business Posts

  • Coca-Cola Earnings Preview: Wall Street Expects Higher Profits as Investors Watch Consumer Spending
  • Two Major Energy Projects Advance Across Eastern Montana
  • PSC Staff Recommends Approval of NorthWestern Energy, Black Hills Merger
  • Wall Street Ends Week Lower as Oil Prices Surge and AI Stocks Retreat

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.