• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

Court blocks Biden rule requiring E.R. doctors to perform abortions

January 5, 2024

(The Center Square) – The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against a Biden administration effort to require emergency room doctors to perform abortions, the latest step in an ongoing legal battle that could end up at the U.S. Supreme Court.

In the case in question, State of Texas v. Becerra, the state of Texas joined forces with the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists as well as the Christian Medical and Dental Associations.

The challengers took on the Biden administrations effort to broaden the interpretation of Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, a rule created to keep certain hospitals with emergency departments from turning patients away.

The Biden administration sought to use that law to require doctors to perform abortions in emergency situations, saying the federal guidance superseded state law.

But the Appellate Court unanimously ruled against the Biden administration.

“The question before the court is whether EMTALA, according to HHS’s Guidance, mandates physicians to provide abortions when that is the necessary stabilizing treatment for an emergency medical condition,” the ruling said. “It does not. We therefore decline to expand the scope of EMTALA.”

Alliance Defending Freedom, a religious freedom legal group involved in the case, celebrated the ruling.

“Hospitals – especially emergency rooms – are tasked with preserving life. The 5th Circuit correctly ruled that the federal government has no business transforming them into abortion clinics,” ADF Senior Vice President of Strategic Initiatives Ryan Bangert said in a statement.

Bangert argued before the court in the case in question.

“Doctors shouldn’t be forced to break the Hippocratic Oath, and they shouldn’t have to choose between violating their deeply held beliefs or facing stiff financial penalties and being barred from the Medicare program,” he said. “Emergency room physicians can, and do, treat life-threatening conditions such as ectopic pregnancies.

“But elective abortion is not life-saving care – it ends the life of the unborn child – and the government has no authority to force doctors to perform these dangerous procedures,” he added.

By Casey Harper | The Center Square

Filed Under: Featured, Politics

Related Articles:

  • Minor-Party Candidates Join Crowded Field in Wyoming’s U.S. House Race
  • Elon Musk’s super PAC starts spending to boost Ken Paxton in Texas
  • Gianforte Seeks Applicants for Flathead County Judicial Vacancy
  • Nation Marks 25th Anniversary of Sept. 11 Attacks
  • U.S. Mint Commemorates 25th Anniversary of September 11 with Half Dollar
  • Alme Favored in Montana Senate Race

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Little Names Two New Members to State Board of Education
  • Seattle mayor gives official explanation for police chief’s forced resignation
  • Illinois sued over digital tax, fee
  • Treasury Flags $17.5 Billion in Suspected Health Care Fraud

Recent Politics Posts

  • Ballot language for Idaho’s abortion vote still not right
  • Armstrong Signs Kratom Restrictions
  • Gianforte Pushes for Flat Income Tax in Montana
  • Zinke Announces Introduction of the A River Runs Through It Act

Recent Business Posts

  • Stocks Rally Friday, Notch Weekly Gains as Volatility Index Plunges
  • GameStop Shares Rise After $1.4 Billion Debt Exchange
  • Oracle Set to Report Earnings Amid History of Wild Post-Earnings Swings
  • Meet Brad Gerstner, the Architect of Trump Accounts

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.