• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

Court blocks Biden rule requiring E.R. doctors to perform abortions

January 5, 2024

(The Center Square) – The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against a Biden administration effort to require emergency room doctors to perform abortions, the latest step in an ongoing legal battle that could end up at the U.S. Supreme Court.

In the case in question, State of Texas v. Becerra, the state of Texas joined forces with the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists as well as the Christian Medical and Dental Associations.

The challengers took on the Biden administrations effort to broaden the interpretation of Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, a rule created to keep certain hospitals with emergency departments from turning patients away.

The Biden administration sought to use that law to require doctors to perform abortions in emergency situations, saying the federal guidance superseded state law.

But the Appellate Court unanimously ruled against the Biden administration.

“The question before the court is whether EMTALA, according to HHS’s Guidance, mandates physicians to provide abortions when that is the necessary stabilizing treatment for an emergency medical condition,” the ruling said. “It does not. We therefore decline to expand the scope of EMTALA.”

Alliance Defending Freedom, a religious freedom legal group involved in the case, celebrated the ruling.

“Hospitals – especially emergency rooms – are tasked with preserving life. The 5th Circuit correctly ruled that the federal government has no business transforming them into abortion clinics,” ADF Senior Vice President of Strategic Initiatives Ryan Bangert said in a statement.

Bangert argued before the court in the case in question.

“Doctors shouldn’t be forced to break the Hippocratic Oath, and they shouldn’t have to choose between violating their deeply held beliefs or facing stiff financial penalties and being barred from the Medicare program,” he said. “Emergency room physicians can, and do, treat life-threatening conditions such as ectopic pregnancies.

“But elective abortion is not life-saving care – it ends the life of the unborn child – and the government has no authority to force doctors to perform these dangerous procedures,” he added.

By Casey Harper | The Center Square

Filed Under: Featured, Politics

Related Articles:

  • Fort Peck, UM Create New Pathway to Business Degree
  • Knudsen Asks Supreme Court to Review Challenge to DEI Training
  • Flint, Forstag Trade Attacks in First Western District Debate
  • Treasury Completes Automatic Enrollment for Trump Accounts
  • Treasury Unveils 2026 Financial Literacy Strategy Focused on Youth, Investing and Fraud
  • Flint Unveils Tax Plan, Targets Forstag’s Lobbying Record

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Montana Labor Commissioner Sarah Swanson Elected to National Workforce Leadership Role
  • South Dakota Joins Generic Drug Price-Fixing Settlements
  • Montana DEQ Commits $1.89 Million to Missoula Affordable Housing Project
  • Knudsen Asks Supreme Court to Review Challenge to DEI Training

Recent Politics Posts

  • Idaho General Fund Revenue Tops Forecast by $90 Million in First Quarter
  • Kellen Willert Appointed Judge in South Dakota’s Fourth Judicial Circuit
  • Montana Senate Candidates Draw Contrasts on Experience, Affordability and Political Independence
  • Poll: Majority of voters concerned about socialists running for office

Recent Business Posts

  • TSMC Earnings Put AI Chip Demand in Focus This Week
  • JPMorgan Set to Lead Bank Earnings Tuesday
  • Sibanye-Stillwater Strike Ends After Workers Approve New Contract
  • Gianforte, Chamber Announce Tech-Focused Economic Summit

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.