• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

Student perspectives on campus protests mixed

September 7, 2024

(The Center Square) – Concerns over free speech on college campuses have intensified since the war in Gaza began last October, according to a new report.

The study shows a growing decline in students’ trust in their institutions’ commitment to protect First Amendment rights, with low-performing schools failing to provide clear policies on free expression.

The 2024 Student Encampment Protests report details the findings of a survey conducted between May and June by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, or FIRE, in conjunction with College Pulse.

FIRE analyzed the responses from 3,803 students enrolled at 30 four-year colleges and universities across the country and then compared it to their recently released College Free Speech Rankings to gauge what impact the protests had on schools’ free speech climate, if any.

Sean Stevens, FIRE’s chief research advisor, told The Center Square that most of the schools were not doing well before the encampments began, but their scores plummeted afterward. He attributes the decline to students’ dissatisfaction with their administrations, but says it also reflects a lack of awareness regarding what is permitted.

The analysis indicates most students reported some level of awareness of their school’s speech policies on campus protests. Specifically, 34% said they were at least “somewhat” aware, 29% “not very,” aware, and 19% “not at all” aware.

While a majority of students are aware actions like creating petitions and holding peaceful marches are allowed, over 10% were unsure, or believe such activities are prohibited. Similarly, most students said they understand that encampments, occupying buildings, and defacing property are not permitted, but 10 to 20% are uncertain, indicating a lack of clarity on the policies.

One notable finding was a record number of de-platforming attempts.

In 2023, 156 were recorded, of which 54 involved a controversy over expression concerning Israel or Palestine. This year to date, of the 110 recorded, there were 75. Until Oct. 7, the issue accounted for 11% of all de-platforming attempts. Since then, related attempts have accounted for 54%.

Other key findings include:

  • Almost three-quarters of students said it is at least “rarely” acceptable to establish an encampment as part of a protest on campus, and 59% said the same about occupying buildings.
  • Over half of Muslim students feel freedom of speech is “not at all” or “not very” secure on campus, and 48% feel “very” or “somewhat” unsafe due to police response to encampments nationwide.
  • Roughly a quarter of Jewish students said their right to freedom of speech is “not at all” or “not very” secure (27%), feel “very” or “somewhat” unsafe on campus (28%), and find the police response to encampments makes them feel “very” or “somewhat” unsafe (26%).
  • One-third of liberal students said the right to freedom of speech is “not at all” or “not very” secure on campus, whereas 26% of moderate and 17% of conservative students said the same.

Stevens noted the difference between protected and unprotected speech, explaining that while campus administrations are within their rights to crack down on disruptive behavior, it is their responsibility to establish speech policies, communicate them clearly, and apply them consistently and fairly – something the underperforming schools have not done.

“Students are seeing the enforcement not being viewpoint neutral,” he added.

The report cautions that the war between Israel and Hamas and the upcoming presidential election “is a combustible situation,” and protests on campus this fall seem inevitable.

FIRE suggests administrators and faculty educate students on the school’s speech policies, how to engage in lawful protest methods, and model civil discourse and dialog across differences. They must also ensure expressive activity policies are clear and consistent and apply them without violating students’ constitutional rights.

While no Pennsylvania schools were included in the report, the University of Pennsylvania made headlines this year after a weekslong pro-Palestine encampment caused uproar. On Aug. 26, the campus temporarily banned overnight demonstrations.

Both reports are available on  FIRE and College Pulse.

By Lauren Jessop | The Center Square contributor

Filed Under: Featured, Home Featured, News

Related Articles:

  • Zinke Welcomes Montana’s Inaugural Honor Flight to Washington, D.C.
  • Conservative campus activist Charlie Kirk shot dead in Utah
  • Attorney General Knudsen Warns Montanans of Deadly Over-the-Counter Opioid
  • Gianforte Honors Veterans in Southwest Montana
  • Sheehy’s Fire Ready Nation Act Passes Senate Unanimously
  • Governor Gianforte Launches Energy Task Force

Primary Sidebar

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Sen. Hoeven to Host Air Force Secretary at 2025 UAS Summit & Expo
  • Montana Selected for National Policy Academy
  • North Dakota Launches $7.5 Million Grant Program to Advance Autonomous Agriculture
  • Wyoming Air National Guard to Host State’s Largest STEAM Experience

Recent Politics Posts

  • Daines Applauds DOI Move to Restore Multiple-Use, Boost Montana Timber Sales
  • Gov. Little Appoints Amanda Ulrich to Seventh Judicial District Judgeship
  • Sheehy’s Fire Ready Nation Act Passes Senate Unanimously
  • Daines Calls for Boosting Tribal Energy Development

Recent Business Posts

  • Governor Gianforte Welcomes Rivian as First Electric Vehicle Manufacturer in Montana
  • Montana State opens quantum computing facility
  • Warren Buffett Marks 95th Birthday With Reflection on Legacy, Berkshire’s Future
  • Montana Commerce Department Launches New Loan Program for Rural Businesses

Copyright © 2025 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.