• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

Johnson Criticizes Democrats After House Vote on DHS Funding

March 28, 2026

House Speaker Mike Johnson sharply criticized Democrats following a House vote on funding for the Department of Homeland Security, accusing them of prioritizing immigration-related policies over national security and public safety.

Johnson’s remarks came after what he described as the third vote in which a bipartisan majority of House members supported funding DHS operations, while most Democrats opposed the measure.

“We are quite frustrated right now,” Johnson said. “For the third time now, almost every Democrat in the House except for a handful voted against the bipartisan, bicameral Department of Homeland Security funding bill.”

Johnson argued the funding measure was necessary to maintain critical operations across DHS agencies, including the Transportation Security Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the U.S. Coast Guard.

He warned that continued funding disputes could impact airport security, disaster response capabilities, and broader national security functions, noting that DHS is one of the largest federal departments and plays a central role in protecting the country.

“You’re talking about TSA; you’re talking about FEMA; you’re talking about the Coast Guard,” Johnson said. “They’re not getting paychecks right now. And that’s why we have all this calamity and all of this danger.”

Johnson also framed the vote as part of a broader political divide ahead of upcoming elections, calling it a “contrast for America” and accusing Democrats of supporting policies he said undermine public safety.

Democrats have argued in previous debates over DHS funding that disagreements center on immigration policy provisions included in funding measures, rather than opposition to funding the department itself.

The latest vote underscores ongoing tensions in Congress over immigration enforcement, border security, and federal spending priorities, with both parties continuing to clash over how best to fund and manage DHS operations.

By BSH Staff

Filed Under: Featured, Politics

Related Articles:

  • Gillman Makes More History as Grizzlies Improve to 3-0
  • Flint Touts Working-Class Background
  • Gianforte Joins Tribal Leaders to Launch Workforce Warriors Poster Series
  • Knudsen to Speak at RNC Midterm Convention
  • Billings Gazette Leaves Longtime Home
  • Court Clears Montana Forest Management Project to Proceed

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Minnesota drops extradition lawsuit against Abbott after ICE officer’s arrest
  • Feds spent $6.7B paying buyout takers to stay home, GAO finds
  • South Dakota Highway Patrol Graduates Nine New Troopers
  • Gianforte Seeks Nominations for 2026 Montana Governor’s Veteran Commendation

Recent Politics Posts

  • Forstag’s Lobbying Record Draws Scrutiny in MT-01 Race
  • Ballot language for Idaho’s abortion vote still not right
  • Armstrong Signs Kratom Restrictions
  • Gianforte Pushes for Flat Income Tax in Montana

Recent Business Posts

  • Big Sky Broadcasting to Acquire Two Missoula-Area Radio Stations
  • Stocks Rally Friday, Notch Weekly Gains as Volatility Index Plunges
  • GameStop Shares Rise After $1.4 Billion Debt Exchange
  • Oracle Set to Report Earnings Amid History of Wild Post-Earnings Swings

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.