• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

DOJ Sues Federal Employee Union, Citing National Security Concerns

March 29, 2025

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against affiliates of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), seeking to end collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) that it claims hinder national security operations.

The lawsuit, filed in the Western District of Texas on behalf of eight federal agencies, follows an executive order issued by President Trump titled Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs. The order asserts that certain agencies engaged in investigative and national security work should not be required to engage in collective bargaining, citing potential risks to government operations.

According to the DOJ, existing CBAs prevent federal agencies from fully implementing workforce policies necessary for their national security missions. The lawsuit aims to confirm the agencies’ legal right to terminate these agreements, avoiding what the DOJ describes as “unnecessary labor strife” while ensuring clarity on the issue.

“We are taking this fight directly to the public-sector unions,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “By affirmatively suing in Texas, we are aggressively protecting President Trump’s efforts to ensure unions no longer interfere in the national security functions of the government.”

The lawsuit argues that collective bargaining agreements have created bureaucratic obstacles that hinder federal agencies’ ability to manage employees performing critical national security, intelligence, and investigative work. It further states that the President “cannot effectively execute the laws or promote national security if his supervision of agents engaged in national security, intelligence, counterintelligence, or investigative missions is stymied by intrusive bargaining agreements and continuous bargaining obligations.”

The case marks a significant escalation in the administration’s efforts to limit the influence of federal employee unions, setting the stage for a legal battle over the intersection of labor rights and national security concerns.

By: DNU staff

Filed Under: Featured, Home Featured, News

Related Articles:

  • Celebrating 118 years of the US Army Reserve
  • Justice Department drops Federal Reserve probe, kicks to watchdog
  • Tesla Bulls Say Heavy Spending Is the Price of Becoming an AI Powerhouse
  • Bozeman Semiconductor Manufacturer Breaks Ground on 80,000-Square-Foot Expansion
  • NYC schools probed over claims of antisemitism
  • Trump to Host King Charles for First State Visit of Second Term

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • UM to Hold Listening Session on Naming of Steve and Shirley Nelson Training Center
  • Del Crandall named dean of UND School of Law
  • Susan Tuve to Deliver USD’s Commencement
  • Have U.S. consumers gone “K-shaped”? A review of the data

Recent Politics Posts

  • Jackson Rancher Sam Mead Announces Run for U.S. Senate
  • Labrador Slams Misleading Political Ads on Child Protection Funding
  • South Dakota Open Meeting Commission to Meet April 27
  • Gianforte Names Advisory Council for Judicial Vacancy

Recent Business Posts

  • Have U.S. consumers gone “K-shaped”? A review of the data
  • Intel Earnings Signal CPU Demand Is Outrunning Supply
  • Gianforte, BHE Montana Celebrate New Great Falls Office
  • U.S. Manufacturing Roars Back

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.