• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Digital News Updates
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business

Lawmakers introduce bills to slash their own pay during government shutdowns

November 3, 2025

(The Center Square) – With the ongoing government shutdown dragging on for a record-breaking period of time, U.S. lawmakers are introducing bills to make shutdowns as painful for Congress as they are for federal workers.

Since the government shut down on Oct.1 after Senate Democrats filibustered Republicans’ House-passed funding bill, hundreds of thousands of federal workers have been furloughed without pay. Thousands more are forced to work without pay because their jobs are considered “essential,” such as air traffic controllers and federal police officers.

But members of Congress, the only people with the power to end the shutdown, are receiving their salaries as usual.

In a show of good faith, some lawmakers have asked the U.S. Treasury to withhold their salaries for the duration of the shutdown. But other lawmakers are taking steps to make that mandatory.

In the upper chamber, U.S. Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., has introduced the Withhold Member Pay During Shutdowns Act, which would cut the annual pay of all members of Congress by the number of days spent in a shutdown.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., has put forward a similar constitutional amendment where lawmakers would receive no pay during the shutdown, and the forfeited money instead would go to the Treasury to help reduce the national debt.

“If Members of Congress had to forfeit their pay during government shutdowns, there would be fewer shutdowns and they would end quicker,” Graham said. “The U.S. Constitution requires Members of Congress to be paid, even during government shutdowns. This is the most constitutionally sound way to deal with this problem.”

In the U.S. House, Rep. Mike Kennedy’s, R-Utah, No Work, No Pay Act of 2025; Rep. Angie Craig’s, D-Minn., No Pay for Disarray Act; and Rep. Derrick Van Orden’s, R-Wis., constitutional amendment would each ensure that members of Congress receive no pay as long as the shutdown continues.

The salary for most senators and representatives is $174,000 annually as of 2025, according to the Congressional Research Service. Given that both chambers are in session for less than half of the year, that means lawmakers would lose more than a thousand dollars per workday during a shutdown, if such a bill passes.

But Rep. Frederica Wilson’s, D-Fla., Government Shutdown Salary Suspension Act goes a step further, preventing not only Congress but also the president and vice president from receiving pay during a shutdown.

President Donald Trump, meanwhile, is losing patience with senators as the government shutdown begins to affect critical federal programs like SNAP. The president told Republicans in a Friday social media post to “Get rid of the Filibuster, and get rid of it, NOW!”

So far, shutdown negotiations have led nowhere, with Democratic and Republican leaders seeming content to wait each other out.

Democrats have demanded that any funding deal extend the pandemic-era expansion of the Obamacare Premium Tax Credit, set to expire Dec. 31. Republicans refuse, accusing Senate Democrats of “holding the government hostage.”

There are some bipartisan efforts to prevent future shutdowns, however. Reps. Bill Huizenga, R-Mich., and Scott Peters, D-Calif., have together introduced the No Budget, No Pay Act, another bill that would withhold lawmaker salaries during a lapse in appropriations.

“If Congress can’t fulfill its most basic duty to pass a budget, it shouldn’t get paid, and Members of Congress shouldn’t get back-pay either,” Huizenga stated.

By Thérèse Boudreaux | The Center Square

Filed Under: Politics

Related Articles:

  • New bill would expand outbound inspections targeting cartel trafficking in US
  • Poll: Inflation tops voter concerns, national debt near the bottom
  • Poll: Majority of voters concerned about socialists running for office
  • Wyoming Voters to Decide 50% Primary-Residence Property Tax Exemption
  • Kellen Willert Appointed Judge in South Dakota’s Fourth Judicial Circuit
  • Bodnar’s Financial Disclosure Reveals Millions in Investments

Primary Sidebar

— Advertisement —

Digital News Updates Logo

Recent News Posts

  • Federal Reserve Report Shows Rising Family Wealth
  • IRS Proposes Stricter Eligibility Rules for Health Insurance Tax Credits
  • A New Y2K Moment: What the Threat of Frontier AI Tells Us about Enterprise Modernization
  • Montana Secures $4.8 Million to Expand Workforce Training in High-Demand Industries

Recent Politics Posts

  • Liberal Groups Criticize Idaho Voting Laws Over Registration Requirements
  • Poll: Inflation tops voter concerns, national debt near the bottom
  • Billings City Council Votes to Sell Lampman Park for $834,000 Housing Development
  • White House Report Estimates $49 Trillion Cost of Democratic Socialist Policies

Recent Business Posts

  • Wall Street Ends Week Lower as Oil Prices Surge and AI Stocks Retreat
  • How much is the NFL worth? Inside America’s most valuable sports league
  • How American defense companies can stay competitive in today’s global environment
  • Financial officers warn rating agencies about using ESG in state credit ratings

Copyright © 2026 Digital News Updates, All Rights Reserved.